![]() ![]() Termination notice, including the notification of non-renewal of Subscription pursuant to section B.5.1, must be made in text form (by signed letter, telefax or email). Massively inconvenient because shitty companies won't secure their products. And now I'm over here keeping MFA active and making sure everything gets signed out. So yeah, the whole thing was shit, it took so much time to get fixed and TeamViewer isn't even going to be held responsible. I finally collected all of it and emailed Jeff bezos directly and the next day someone called me and refunded it properly this time. I tweeted at Amazon and they said they would help and then told me they cant help. I opened a fraud statement with my bank, Amazon asked me to cancel it and they would refund me, so I canceled it and the refund still didn't happen. TeamViewer continued to insist they totally were not hacked while thousands posted and reported it.Īlso amazon promised to refund me but didn't, so I called again and they said the refund was submitted, still didn't get it. I was at work and got an email from Amazon for like 10 gift card purchases within a few minutes and instantly killed it. This doesn’t make it right for TeamViewer, but at least it would be one step closer towards neutering greedy marketing.Ugh, I had my account password + unique device password. This would utterly destroy the relevance of email bombardment and crater open rates, especially if the client doesn’t show the unread count for the thread, since older unread content from that sender doesn’t matter. There’s a simple fix, of course: threading by ‘sender’, where you just mark a given email as sent-by Nordstrom or whatever, and all future emails go into that thread, and it shows newest-first and defaults to “mark all older messages read”. Modern email clients don’t comprehend the concept “I want one thread in my email listing for all Nordstrom emails”, so retailers just bombard us all to death with emails to flood our inbox. It’s bad enough that brands are so thirsty for our wallets, but they had to find a way to be even more greedy and cruel about it. I don’t exaggerate in my testing with fresh email addresses, registering as a woman at fashion-linked retailers would generate up to 4 emails per day from certain well-known retailers, while registering as a man simply would not (or maybe one a week, or month). ![]() It would horrify a lot of people to discover that clothing and personal care businesses that market specifically to women send 10-100x as many emails per month to their customers as other businesses. If Spotify did this it would be easier for Spotify to just ask creators for an Ad-Free RSS feed for paying subs (which a lot of podcasters have to give to their own paying listeners).Įdit: Spotify does have a "Spotify Podcast Ads" system, but thats just for content that is "Spotify Original and Exclusive titles" and not (atleast yet) open to podcasters who also distribute their content on other platforms. Creators would have to report lower listener numbers to advertisers because paid Spotify listeners wouldn't get the ads being sold. If Spotify asked permission to remove such ads to avoid copyright issues, creators would want to be compensated for the drop in Ad Rev. If Spotify removed the ads from podcasts to serve ad free versions to their paying subs without the permission of the content creators that would most likely be copyright infringement. This is the same for Apple Podcasts/Google Podcasts/Tunein/Stitcher/Etc. The vast majority of podcasts on Spotify are from podcast creators submitting their RSS feed to Spotify because it has a decent userbase. Spotify doesn't share the subscription with most podcasts (Obv exception being Joe Rogan, but thats an exclusivity deal, I'm not sure if it even went "Ad Free" after the Spotify deal as I've not listened to it in years). > If you pay for the Spotify subscription I'd expect _all_ ads to be removed. Looking at the stats for a couple of podcats I help in the backend of, we tend to get more people listening on Spotify then we do on any of the other platforms. ![]() ![]() From a podcast creators point of view Spotify has a large userbase for your listeners to fid you on. You just have one app for your music and your podcasts. Why not just use another service instead of Spotify for podcasts?. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |